Written by Diamond Dog on 20 December 2007.

I made a new friend last summer when I got around to reading Pat
Buchanan's autobiography,
Right From The Beginning. While I don't agree with Mr.
Buchanan on everything, I must say that his book, laced with humor and humility
in its telling of his upbringing as a Catholic and a conservative, helped me to
know the man behind the name. Buchanan was coming of age during the Vietnam War
and it left its stamp on him. He seems to believe more often than not that
America ought to leave the world to its own devices rather than going overseas
to fight for other people's freedoms. And he is very reticent toward seeing how
anybody elses freedom might benefit the good ol' U. S of A. This makes Buchanan
a paleoconservative isolationist for the most part, if not entirely.

So, it's not very much of a surprise to see Buchanan's magazine,
The American Conservative and its bold depiction of Rudy Giuliani resembling a
Brown Shirted Schatz, "I, Rudy". In the centerpiece article by Michael C. Desch,
Declaring Forever War, the author clangs the warning bells;
I was so appalled by the mayors
simplistic message that terrorists were attacking us because they "oppose our
freedom and ... want to impose their ideology on us" that I ignored protocol and
challenged him during the Q&A. To the accompaniment of hisses from the
rabidly pro-Rudy students, I reminded the mayor that Islamic fundamentalists in
Saudi Arabia, Iran, and elsewhere in the Middle East have taken our side against
al-Qaeda at various times. Like the students, Hizzonor was not amused, and I got
five minutes of unvarnished Rudy chiding me for just not getting
it.
To the
cheers of the partisan crowd, Giuliani argued that my failure to see the
connection between Islamic fundamentalist terrorist groups [was] a recipe for
disaster. In his view, the campaign of radical Islamic terrorism began back in
the 1960s and 1970s and included things like the Black September attack upon
Israeli Olympic athletes at Munich in 1972. He ridiculed my call to disaggregate
the terrorist threat, saying it ignored the fact that Yasir Arafat, whom, he
lamented, we helped win the Nobel Prize, was responsible for slaughtering 29
Americans over the years.
Desch
then goes on to attack the neocons who rank as Rudy's top foreign affairs
advisors; Norman Podhoretz, Martin Kramer
(Middle East), Stephen Rosen (defense), S. Enders Wimbush (diplomacy), Peter
Berkowitz (statecraft, human rights, and freedom), Kim Holmes (foreign policy),
and Daniel Pipes. Desch ridicules Podhoretz's view that this current war we find
ourselves in today is World War IV and he dismisses his advocacy of stopping
Iran with our military power;
And he doesnt
stop at Iraq: Podhoretz constantly beats the drum for bombing Iran to halt its
nascent nuclear program. Air Marshal Podhoretz assured The Telegraph
that the air campaign would take five minutes. His optimism that attacking Iran
would be another cakewalk combines with pessimism about the prospects of
multilateral sanctions preventing Iran from getting the bomb. "Yet for all their
retrospective remorse over the wholesale slaughter of the Jews back then,"
Podhoretz sneers, "the Europeans seem no readier to lift a finger to prevent a
second Holocaust than they were the first time
around."
While I doubt it
was Buchanan's or Desch's objective, I think this sort of editorializing will go
a good way toward helping grow more support for Rudy rather than chase it away.
It might be easy to assume that a President Romney or a President Thompson might
do just as good a job going and staying on offense in the Terrorists' War On Us
as President Giuliani would. We have Buchanan and The American Conservative
magazine to thank for pointing out that Rudy is uniquely qualified and
understands this threat better than anyone else in the
field.
And then, sure
enough, here come the personal attacks that we always know we can count on
coming from Rudy's
enemies
Some hope that all of this is just posturing to
secure the Republican nomination, which will be delivered by a base troubled by
Giulianis multiple marriages, occasional cross-dressing, and support for
abortion, civil unions, and immigrants rights. A post on Matthew Yglesiass
Atlantic Monthly blog offered a theory: "Giuliani is stocking up on
these stock characters not for real advice - hes not that insane - but rather
to get out a sort of dogwhistle message to the true rightwing nuts, who are
willing to forgive a guy anything if he will only pledge to nuke significant
parts of the Middle East." Yglesias himself is not so sure: he thinks Rudy is
"bat-s - - t
insane."
Desch doesn't bother to point out that Rudy dressed
up as Marilyn Monroe in the Big Apple for its famous parade on Halloween. He
also doesn't bother to explain that Rudy has a tough plan to stop illegal
immigration with a fence, a biometric id card and a data base. He insidiously
claims that Rudy is in "support for abortion" when this is not really accurate.
Rudy hates abortion and is pro-choice, which is really something else, as Rudy
pledges to see abortion rates decrease while he would increase adoptions. That's
not the same thing as "support for abortion". But no matter, as Buchanan and
Desch are out to smear Rudy even if they have to stoop so low as to bring in a
rabid lefty of the stripes of Matthew Yglesias to do their dirty work for
them.
All in all, I'd say this issue of The Conservative
American, "I, Rudy" belongs on every coffee table in the country. It can only
help him win his party's
nomination.
Meanwhile, it should be remembered that my friend
Pat Buchanan is a pessimist on the subject of America's future, while Rudy
believes in opportunity and the American
future.