Articles

Print

Attack Of The PaleoCons

Written by Diamond Dog on 20 December 2007.

ImageI made a new friend last summer when I got around to reading Pat Buchanan's autobiography, Right From The Beginning. While I don't agree with Mr. Buchanan on everything, I must say that his book, laced with humor and humility in its telling of his upbringing as a Catholic and a conservative, helped me to know the man behind the name. Buchanan was coming of age during the Vietnam War and it left its stamp on him. He seems to believe more often than not that America ought to leave the world to its own devices rather than going overseas to fight for other people's freedoms. And he is very reticent toward seeing how anybody elses freedom might benefit the good ol' U. S of A. This makes Buchanan a paleoconservative isolationist for the most part, if not entirely.
ImageSo, it's not very much of a surprise to see Buchanan's magazine, The American Conservative and its bold depiction of Rudy Giuliani resembling a Brown Shirted Schatz, "I, Rudy". In the centerpiece article by Michael C. Desch, Declaring Forever War, the author clangs the warning bells;
 
I was so appalled by the mayor’s simplistic message that terrorists were attacking us because they "oppose our freedom and ... want to impose their ideology on us" that I ignored protocol and challenged him during the Q&A. To the accompaniment of hisses from the rabidly pro-Rudy students, I reminded the mayor that Islamic fundamentalists in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and elsewhere in the Middle East have taken our side against al-Qaeda at various times. Like the students, Hizzonor was not amused, and I got five minutes of unvarnished Rudy chiding me for just not getting it.  
 
To the cheers of the partisan crowd, Giuliani argued that my failure to see the connection between Islamic fundamentalist terrorist groups [was] a recipe for disaster. In his view, the campaign of radical Islamic terrorism began back in the 1960s and 1970s and included things like the Black September attack upon Israeli Olympic athletes at Munich in 1972. He ridiculed my call to disaggregate the terrorist threat, saying it ignored the fact that Yasir Arafat, whom, he lamented, we helped win the Nobel Prize, was responsible for slaughtering 29 Americans over the years.
 
Desch then goes on to attack the neocons who rank as Rudy's top foreign affairs advisors; Norman Podhoretz, Martin Kramer (Middle East), Stephen Rosen (defense), S. Enders Wimbush (diplomacy), Peter Berkowitz (statecraft, human rights, and freedom), Kim Holmes (foreign policy), and Daniel Pipes. Desch ridicules Podhoretz's view that this current war we find ourselves in today is World War IV and he dismisses his advocacy of stopping Iran with our military power;
 
And he doesn’t stop at Iraq: Podhoretz constantly beats the drum for bombing Iran to halt its nascent nuclear program. Air Marshal Podhoretz assured The Telegraph  that the air campaign would take five minutes. His optimism that attacking Iran would be another cakewalk combines with pessimism about the prospects of multilateral sanctions preventing Iran from getting the bomb. "Yet for all their retrospective remorse over the wholesale slaughter of the Jews back then," Podhoretz sneers, "the Europeans seem no readier to lift a finger to prevent a second Holocaust than they were the first time around."
 
While I doubt it was Buchanan's or Desch's objective, I think this sort of editorializing will go a good way toward helping grow more support for Rudy rather than chase it away. It might be easy to assume that a President Romney or a President Thompson might do just as good a job going and staying on offense in the Terrorists' War On Us as President Giuliani would. We have Buchanan and The American Conservative magazine to thank for pointing out that Rudy is uniquely qualified and understands this threat better than anyone else in the field.
 
And then, sure enough, here come the personal attacks that we always know we can count on coming from Rudy's enemies
 
Some hope that all of this is just posturing to secure the Republican nomination, which will be delivered by a base troubled by Giuliani’s multiple marriages, occasional cross-dressing, and support for abortion, civil unions, and immigrants’ rights. A post on Matthew Yglesias’s Atlantic Monthly  blog offered a theory: "Giuliani is stocking up on these stock characters not for real advice - he’s not that insane - but rather to get out a sort of dogwhistle message to the true rightwing nuts, who are willing to forgive a guy anything if he will only pledge to nuke significant parts of the Middle East." Yglesias himself is not so sure: he thinks Rudy is "bat-s - - t insane." 
 
Desch doesn't bother to point out that Rudy dressed up as Marilyn Monroe in the Big Apple for its famous parade on Halloween. He also doesn't bother to explain that Rudy has a tough plan to stop illegal immigration with a fence, a biometric id card and a data base. He insidiously claims that Rudy is in "support for abortion" when this is not really accurate. Rudy hates abortion and is pro-choice, which is really something else, as Rudy pledges to see abortion rates decrease while he would increase adoptions. That's not the same thing as "support for abortion". But no matter, as Buchanan and Desch are out to smear Rudy even if they have to stoop so low as to bring in a rabid lefty of the stripes of  Matthew Yglesias to do their dirty work for them.
 
All in all, I'd say this issue of The Conservative American, "I, Rudy" belongs on every coffee table in the country. It can only help him win his party's nomination.
 
Meanwhile, it should be remembered that my friend Pat Buchanan is a pessimist on the subject of America's future, while Rudy believes in opportunity and the American future.